S.T.E.P. Diagnostic

Where is your transformation losing execution integrity?

Rate twelve statements from 1 (not true) to 5 (consistently true). The result is directional and designed to improve the next conversation.

Indicative execution integrity

3.0/5Priority: Strategy Coherence

Strategy CoherenceThe transformation thesis and trade-offs are explicit.Strategy CoherenceThe portfolio reflects the stated priorities.Strategy CoherenceSponsors use the same definition of success.Trust & MandateDecision rights and escalation paths are clear.Trust & MandateCritical stakeholders have an explicit mandate.Trust & MandateDifficult issues surface early enough to act.Economic DisciplineCost, risk and value are managed as one system.Economic DisciplineBenefits have named owners and evidence.Economic DisciplineResources match the strategic priorities.Performance DeliveryOutcomes have one accountable owner.Performance DeliveryReviews trigger decisions, not more reporting.Performance DeliveryThe next 90 days have a disciplined cadence.

Interpretation

Execution is viable but exposed. Strengthen the weakest dimension before adding initiatives.

This self-assessment is directional, not a validated diagnostic or professional opinion.

Discuss the result confidentially